Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, employment HOST: Federal workers have until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to depart and employment be paid till the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment attorney who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually do not consider it so much a deal. I think it’s a request to resign with a vague promise that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been using the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for as much as eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a very misleading term to use in this situation. When you think of a buyout, there’s typically some sort of composed contract or a concrete offer to provide a benefit in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your advice, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe caution. There are no guarantees contained in this email. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of staff member who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most careful because leaving earlier than meant can have serious consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is a good offer for people who don’t wish to return to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is very generously offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work actually tough to resign. I think it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes due to the fact that there are no warranties. And these are individuals who love their task. They enjoy the mission of the agency. They strive. And today, they’re facing very tough choices, specifically if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: employment You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, employment they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal challenges simply to the offer itself? And employment if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be truthful, is so extraordinary that I believe a great deal of us are still attempting to figure out what to do with it. I’m not sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase firms to provide this variety of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite possibly setting the stage for challenges because I feel OPM has significantly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for employment signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our website regards to use and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR records are produced on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text might not remain in its last kind and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule might vary. The reliable record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.